There are already robotic journalists. Sure, they aren't very good, but they're getting better faster than human journalists are.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
At the end of the day, there is still one function of journalism that cannot be computerized, and that is reporters. You're always going to need reporters.
We're going to become caretakers for the robots. That's what the next generation of work is going to be.
In the future, I'm sure there will be a lot more robots in every aspect of life. If you told people in 1985 that in 25 years they would have computers in their kitchen, it would have made no sense to them.
The way that the robotics market is going to grow, at least in the home, is that we'll have a number of different special purpose robots.
Robots will someday, or maybe, wake up. They may be really smart. They may be as creative, smart and capable as human beings, and fully conscious, and self discerning with free will.
Robots are good at things that are structured.
We're seeing the arrival of conversational robots that can walk in our world. It's a golden age of invention.
Pretty soon we'll have robots in our society, you're going to have a lot of automated processes that used to be done by people - this is happening. Society and technology is changing so fast, and the impact of the change on society and technology is global, not local.
There aren't enough good journalists. There are too many who really weren't groomed to be reporters and, as a result, some of the reporting is shallow.
Robots have a rich and storied history in movies.
No opposing quotes found.