Isn't an agnostic just an atheist without balls?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I have to recognize that I am agnostic.
In theory I am an agnostic, but pending the appearance of rational evidence, I must be classed, practically and provisionally, as an atheist.
I don't think I've ever been an agnostic. I've always thought there's a superior power, that this is not the real world and that there's a world to come.
I oscillate between agnosticism and atheism.
For all the creationists out there, Darwin's just an atheist. But he was actually agnostic.
I can't gather around and talk about how much everybody in the room doesn't believe in God. I just don't - I don't have the energy for that, and so I... Agnostic separates me from the conduct of atheists whether or not there is strong overlap between the two categories, and at the end of the day I'd rather not be any category at all.
No man can be an agnostic who has a sense of humour.
I may have had a prejudice against agnosticism as a body of thought: sort of a fence-sitting theory, where you can't make up your mind one way or another.
You go back to T. H. Huxley, who coined the term, what he said - and I came to believe he is right - is that agnosticism asserts not only that he himself didn't know if there was a God or not, but that nobody could know.
An atheist is a man who has no invisible means of support.
No opposing quotes found.