Novelists embody plural selves all the time. What are characters, after all, if not other selves?
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Every character a writer creates has some of themselves in it somewhere.
I think every writer will tell you that their characters are always partially themselves: who I am and what I've experienced. It's always there in part of my characters.
All the characters in my books are imagined, but all have a bit of who I am in them - much like the characters in your dreams are all formed by who you are.
I suppose all fictional characters, especially in adventure or heroic fiction, at the end of the day are our dreams about ourselves. And sometimes they can be really revealing.
Readers embrace all kinds of characters as long as they are written with emotional truth.
I think all characters are facets of the writer. In a way, they have to be if you're going to write them convincingly.
It's really a misconception to identify the writer with the main character, given that the author creates all the characters in the book. In certain ways, I'm every character.
I guess you could say that no matter what the characters are enduring, I try to make them retain their humanity. Their self-absorbed, grouchy, selfish, aggravating humanity.
There are so many separate selves; no one who writes creatively hasn't felt that.
I've always thought a novelist only has one character, and that is himself or herself. In my case, me.