When artists make art, they shouldn't question whether it is permissible to do one thing or another.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
As long as artists arbitrarily assume the right to decide what is or is not art, it is logical that the public will just as arbitrarily feel that they have the right to reject it.
An artist cannot be responsible for what people make of their art. An audience loathe giving up preconceived images of an artist.
Artists shouldn't deal with business stuff; that's not what we're trained in, and most of us aren't good at it.
Artists can do whatever they want!
I have no ethics when it comes to art. You just do what you can to make it as beautiful as you can.
There are situations which cannot honorably be met by art.
I think the definition of an artist is not necessarily tied into excellence or talent; an artist is somebody who, if you took away their freedom to make art, would lose their mind.
The responsibility of an artist is to be honest with themselves.
Art is not a thing; it is a way.
I mean, art for art's sake is ridiculous. Art is for the sake of one's needs.
No opposing quotes found.