Those in the international community that refuse to put red lines before Iran don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I do not put red lines on the Arab Palestinian nation.
The United States, and the president's made this clear, does not want Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. That's a red line for us. And it's a red line obviously for the Israelis so we share a common goal here.
The red line must be drawn on Iran's nuclear enrichment program because these enrichment facilities are the only nuclear installations that we can definitely see and credibly target.
I don't think that the Iranians, even if they got the bomb, they're going to drop it immediately on some neighbor. They fully understand what might follow. They're radical, but not total mishuginas.
Well, Israel, obviously, thinks of the Iranian nuclear program as an existential threat to Israel.
Our bottom line, if you want to call it a red line, president's bottom line has been that Iran will not acquire a nuclear weapon and we will take no option off the table to ensure that it does not acquire a nuclear weapon, including the military option.
You don't have any communication between the Israelis and the Iranians. You have all sorts of local triggers for conflict. Having countries act on a hair trigger - where they can't afford to be second to strike - the potential for a miscalculation or a nuclear war through inadvertence is simply too high.
Iran has a dismal record on human rights.
Red lines are kind of political arguments that are used to try to put people in a corner.
You have to show Israel that it's not going to be forced to do things it doesn't want to do and can't do.
No opposing quotes found.