A man may keep a woman, but not his estate.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Any man who holds a woman back is not a man a woman can afford to be with.
Woman must have her freedom, the fundamental freedom of choosing whether or not she will be a mother and how many children she will have. Regardless of what man's attitude may be, that problem is hers - and before it can be his, it is hers alone.
In the end, the women can be very rebellious, and very capable and all of that, but if she depends on a man economically, she has few possibilities.
A man who is not with a woman is a dead man.
I don't believe man is a woman's natural enemy. Perhaps his lawyer is.
It is high time to compel man by the might of right to give woman her political, legal and social rights. She will find her own sphere in accordance with her capacities, powers and tastes; and yet she will be woman still.
Men will bear many things from a kept mistress, which they would not bear from a wife.
The comfortable estate of widowhood is the only hope that keeps up a wife's spirits.
A married woman has the same natural right to acquire and hold property, and to make all contracts that she is mentally competent to make reasonably, as has a married man, or any other man.
A man perceives himself as owning and being owned by a woman.