The unions say 'last hired - first fired,', we say hire and fire based on merit. We want the best and brightest in the classroom.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We should be firing bad teachers.
Unions inherently create an 'us versus them' dynamic that makes winning against a company's management the top goal, not serving customers, innovating, or in the case of education, teaching kids.
Due process policies such as tenure are put in place to protect good teachers from being fired without cause. They aren't there to protect 'bad' teachers.
In politics, merit is rewarded by the possessor being raised, like a target, to a position to be fired at.
Public school teachers enjoy a huge amount of job security, thanks to their powerful unions and inflexible work rules.
Getting fired is hard.
There is nothing that says unions have a God-given right to be there. We have to work at it and make ourselves relevant to every section of the workforce.
I just think the most important aspect in being able to have a productive relationship between the teachers' unions and the districts and the states that they're dealing with is that the person sitting across the table from them should not have received the largest campaign contributions from the teachers' union itself.
I want to work with the teachers' union. But as I said out there, we have to put the kids first and we are letting down a generation of California children. It's not acceptable.
Unions go hand-in-hand with a strong middle class.
No opposing quotes found.