People always ask me 'do you think there should be more bands doing political music?' and I say 'absolutely not.'
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I don't think music should be played anywhere near politics. The two don't go together.
In America, there's more of the question, should music be political or should it just be for entertainment purposes, whereas around the world that's not even an issue. I think people just assume that music should be everything.
We're not a political band, we're a socially-minded band.
Music shouldn't be based around money or politics. Music should be a bunch of people that really do great songs together doing them together for the pursuit of having a good time.
I'm not really one of those people who believes that if you're a musician you can just leave that behind and start getting into politics.
Democracy can tie your hands in a rock 'n' roll band, you know? It can be a great thing, but if you've got a certain amount of vision and you write a lot of songs, it's sometimes better to have your own band and make your own decisions.
It has always seemed slightly uncomfortable, the idea of politicised musicians. Very few of them are clever enough to do it; if they're good at the political side, the music side suffers, and vice versa.
A band is not a democracy: It's show business.
Sadly, I've seen a lot of bands hit that sort of peak and then eventually start supporting again, you know, which we will never do. We always put a lot of thought into the way that we are going to go, and we always change.
I don't find music being less important than, like, politics.