Of course I'm schooled in the old school method: taking what I think the director wants, then reworking it through my own brain and heart.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
As a director, I really wanted to learn and I needed to get away from my own stuff to figure out how to just do things and work with good people.
As a director, I've been able to combine with what I've learned as an actor and as a producer: it melds quite nicely into what I feel like I should have been doing all along.
You work with great directors and terrible directors, and so you learn; you take what you think will work for you.
As the director, you have it in your mind how you want the part done, how you want someone to do it, and so sometimes you just say, 'Why don't I do it myself?' So for a little role, I'll just do it.
When I was a kid it was much more difficult. You're trying to understand what the director wants. It's a learning process. Now, you go in and it's more of a collaboration.
Once I went to film school, I realized that film directing was actually much better than theater directing, because you kind of get to stay in control of it all the way through. You don't relinquish the piece to the actors like you have to in theater; you stay in control through the very end.
I know as a director I hit it out of the park sometimes, and sometimes we haven't, and that's kind of the way art goes. You just have to be willing to take the 'failures' and learn from them, make the best of them.
I think that's the key to being a director: to be able to get the shot and move on quickly.
I always start a film thinking I know how to do it, then I learn all over again.
I just knew how to do the one thing I did, and whether I did it well or not depended on who the director was.