In retrospect, 'Pulp Fiction' isn't just the template for everything Tarantino has done but the yardstick by which everything else he does is measured one way or another.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
There's no one out there like Quentin Tarantino. His films have a signature look, and they never just stick to the same kind of story.
In some ways, I think 'Pulp Fiction' hurt cinema in a very, very minor, small way. It did a massive amount of good. But it also made it impossible to make a movie even remotely like it without someone comparing it to 'Pulp Fiction.'
I don't think Pulp Fiction is hard to watch at all.
'Pulp Fiction' is an amazing film, and I haven't made one nearly as good.
I will never do 'Pulp Fiction 2,' but having said that, I could very well do other movies with these characters.
Quentin Tarantino was fantastic. I mean, he can be almost unbearable as a person. At a party, you can't get a word in edgewise for, like, an hour. But as a director, he is so completely open and just... present.
I wouldn't define myself as the girl from 'Pulp Fiction.'
The beauty of a Tarantino film is that the visuals match the rhythm of the words. That's his goal. And that's my goal.
Pulp existed for 12 years before we got famous. Now, you could say that was just lack of imagination, but it's some kind of quality isn't it? Tenacity. You could also say it was sloth.
The real difference between literature and pulp is the kind of emotional responses they elicit. Dan Brown can't pierce your heart. Patricia Cornwell can't make you read a sentence twice and then look sightlessly out of the window.
No opposing quotes found.