Why is it that the king can do no wrong? This shows they do not regard the king as being a human. But the king can do wrong.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
A king is a thing men have made for their own sakes, for quietness sake. Just as in a family one man is appointed to buy the meat.
I am not afraid if the criticism concerns what I do wrong, because then I know. Because if you say the King cannot be criticized, it means that the King is not human.
That the king can do no wrong is a necessary and fundamental principle of the English constitution.
There are some examples of medieval kings who were terrible human beings but were nevertheless good kings.
Your part can be the king, but unless people are treating you like royalty, you ain't no king, man.
Fashion as King is sometimes a very stupid ruler.
If the king loves music, there is little wrong in the land.
There is an English saying that the king is always happy, or, 'happy as the king' - which is not true at all. But I can be as happy as a king if all of you know what is right and what is wrong and cooperate to fix things.
The enemies cannot destroy the king who has at his service the respect and friendship of the wise men who can find fault, disagree, and correct him.
A king without power is an absurdity.
No opposing quotes found.