There is the odd exception, like Albert Einstein, but as a breed, scientists tend not be very good at presenting themselves.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
One could not be a successful scientist without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of scientists, a goodly number of scientists are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
I believe scientists have a duty to share the excitement and pleasure of their work with the general public, and I enjoy the challenge of presenting difficult ideas in an understandable way.
In my experience, if people don't have a sense of humor, they are usually not very good scientists, either.
If you look at the scientists who really make a difference, they think boldly. They're not afraid to question what they see.
It is not easy to imagine how little interested a scientist usually is in the work of any other, with the possible exception of the teacher who backs him or the student who honors him.
The caricature of science is that we hold tight to the theories we have, and shun challenges to them. That's just not true. In fact, we hold our highest rewards for those scientists who can prove others wrong. And by the way, they are famous in their own lifetimes. We don't wait until they're dead.
People don't generally listen to scientists much.
The best scientists that I've met are those that are humanists and scientists at the same time.
Scientific experiments are expensive, and people are entitled to know about them if they want to. I think it is very difficult to convey ideas.
A humble scientist is a good scientist.
No opposing quotes found.