The attack on Clinton on terrorism is entirely politically inspired by the right-wing of the Republicans, and has no basis in fact whatsoever.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Clinton himself acted in ways which increased the threat of terror.
What happened to the Bush Administration regarding terrorism is that they regarded it as a secondary issue, and associated with Clinton. One of those Clinton issues.
No, I do not identify with the right wing.
Clinton was very early on aware of the problem of international terrorism.
Ms. Clinton, like the Obama administration more broadly, believes that appeasing Islamists... promotes peace and stability.
'Terrorism' itself is not an objective term or legitimate object of study, but was conceived of as a highly politicized instrument and has been used that way ever since.
All of these attacks on Secretary Clinton, at the end of the day, are character attacks.
The right-wing of the Republican party isn't so much a political agenda as a plea for help.
Terrorism, to me, is the use of terror for political purpose, and terror is indiscriminate murder of civilians to make a political point.
Any terrorism is an attack on libertarian values.