What can be indissoluble if a perpetual Union, made more perfect, is not?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Union can achieve everything when sustained by gallant hearts and correct principles, while anarchy and insubordination must fail in the achievement of every thing beneficial and glorious to mankind.
The Union, which can alone insure internal peace, and external security to each State, Must and Shall be Preserved, cost what it may in time, treasure, and blood.
The Constitution in all its provisions looks to an indestructible union disposed of indestructible States.
The methods by which a trade union can alone act, are necessarily destructive; its organization is necessarily tyrannical.
What one state could not get alone, what one miner against a powerful corporation could not achieve, can be achieved by the union.
In 1787, many Americans were convinced that the 'perpetual union' they had created in winning independence was collapsing. Six years earlier, in the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen state governments had surrendered extensive powers to a congress of delegates from each state legislature.
By union the smallest states thrive. By discord the greatest are destroyed.
If not met promptly and decidedly, the two portions of the Union will gradually become thoroughly alienated, when no alternative will be left to us, as the weaker of the two, but to sever all political ties or sink down into abject submission.
The result of this union would be, not the fortuitous result of a series of approximations and concessions, but the harmonious synthesis of two aspects of a single thought.
The indestructible is one: it is each individual human being and, at the same time, it is common to all, hence the incomparably indivisible union that exists between human beings.
No opposing quotes found.