Even some of the greatest technology-led revolutions, or allegedly technology-led, really were only made possible because of trends already present.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The thing that's changed the most has just been the rapid technology.
The problem is that there are very few technologies that essentially haven't changed for 60, 70 years.
Education must be the only sector that hasn't already been completely revolutionized by technology.
Technological 'revolutions' don't really overthrow anything - they simply append a new and dynamic market to that which went before.
New technologies, however remarkable they might seem, are fundamentally just tools made by people for people.
Personally, I believe that government, rather than money, tends to be the primary factor limiting the development of new technologies.
Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change.
During my eighty-seven years I have witnessed a whole succession of technological revolutions. But none of them has done away with the need for character in the individual or the ability to think.
In some cases, inventions prohibit innovation because we're so caught up in playing with the technology, we forget about the fact that it was supposed to be important.
Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.