Before 1980, it was basically illegal for U.S. banks to invent new products.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
When ATM machines came out and people were prosecuted for robbing ATM machines, I don't think anybody thought the banks were against technology because they didn't want their ATM machines lifted.
Anytime we wanted to do something, we found a way to do it through conventional banking means.
If government were a product, selling it would be illegal.
You read constantly that banks are lobbying regulators and elected officials as if this is inappropriate. We don't look at it that way.
Nearly 100 years ago, when Planned Parenthood was founded, birth control was illegal.
I believe we are in a world where innovation in stuff was outlawed. It was basically outlawed in the last 40 years - part of it was environmentalism, part of it was risk aversion.
The thought for a long time was that banks needed to be too controlled, too regulated to be turned over to the Wild West of the Net. Then the credit meltdown hit, and we saw just how reckless these so-called safe and regulated institutions were.
The Emergency Banking Act reached back in time to amend the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, which had originally been intended to criminalize economic intercourse between American citizens and declared enemies of the United States.
Banking technology has made it simple and efficient to invest in good causes.
The criminal law needs to be improved to meet new forms of crime, but to denounce financial devices which are useful and legitimate because use is made of them for fraud, is ridiculous and unworthy of the age in which we live.
No opposing quotes found.