There was never a war on poverty. Maybe there was a skirmish on poverty.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
When you talk about war on poverty it doesn't mean very much; but if you can show to some degree this sort of thing then you can show a great deal more of how people are living and a very great percentage of our people today.
Poverty is not inevitable. It is a human ill that we can fight if we decide to do so together.
If war is the solution, why didn't Roosevelt declare war on poverty?
Poverty doesn't imply necessarily violence.
Poverty is about people lacking the tools they need to get on in life. And solving it is about tackling educational failure, antisocial behaviour, debt problems and addiction, and of course it's about work.
For too long, we've attached some mythic notion to government solutions, and yet, 40 years after we began the War on Poverty, poverty still abounds.
Poverty is the absence of all human rights. The frustrations, hostility and anger generated by abject poverty cannot sustain peace in any society.
A doctrine of class war seemed to provide a solution to the problem of poverty to people who know nothing about how wealth is created.
We have mistaken the nature of poverty, and thought it was economic poverty. No, it is poverty of soul, deprivation of God's recreating, loving peace.
It is not poverty so much as pretense that harasses a ruined man - the struggle between a proud mind and an empty purse - the keeping up of a hollow show that must soon come to an end.
No opposing quotes found.