Putting the budget ahead of the policy is the wrong way to do it. It's too often the way it's done in Washington.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Government spending clearly needs some adjusting. But a budget is a statement of our priorities, and balancing our spending on the backs of our nation's seniors is not the right approach.
The budget doesn't have much control over the government. Then again, the government doesn't have much control over the budget.
The right way to deal with a budget problem that was years in the making is by formulating a credible plan to reduce the deficit over time and as the economy is able to withstand the necessary fiscal belt-tightening. That is what President Obama is doing.
We need to focus on issues where we all agree, which is spending discipline and control and making sure that government, both in Springfield and in Washington, doesn't take more from your family budget.
We're going to have to control the spending of government.
Well, I think the president has clearly submitted us a tight budget, but it's what's called for if we're going to get spending under control and keep the economy moving in the right direction, with economic growth and job creation activity.
There is a difficult leap between talking about balancing the budget and actually doing it.
What's the point of creating a budget if it's not possible to follow through?
The reason we have such a reform budget is because we've been thinking about these things for a long time.
To be honest, I haven't seen much serious budget planning since the Republicans took control of the House after the 2010 elections and grabbed onto the Senate filibuster. It's not the White House's fault that John Boehner couldn't deliver on a bigger deal.
No opposing quotes found.