I would make the movie industry more like the television industry. TV is more material driven. In TV, you can break new stars. TV can take more chances.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I'd rather do movies 'cause I am better at movies, but I do shows 'cause the opportunities have come forward.
I don't have real big aspirations to be a movie star. I would love to be on a long-running hit TV show. You end up playing a defining role.
I'd like to do more TV; TV is completely different than working in movies in a lot of ways, it's like making a really compact movie. Because you don't have as much time, especially hour long shows, they move so quickly.
I would rather do many small roles on TV, stage or film than one blockbuster that made me rich but had no acting.
I got into this business because I like acting and I want to make movies. I would be happy living the rest of my life never famous.
The reason I prefer working with established actors and stars is because they are more popular, and the film reaches out to more people and do well in terms of numbers, too.
For myself, I would rather take less roles and be working on films that I'm passionate about, that are going to challenge me and that I'm going to be growing from. I don't ever want to take a movie just for the sake of working.
You know, film is the ultimate goal in an actor's career. I mean, I still love TV. I have my feet firmly stamped in it. But my opportunities have been bigger and better.
I'd rather do a lot of movies than a TV series and do a lot of different roles than be stuck in one TV thing.
I think as a filmmaker my first contribution would just be to make a good movie that people would love to see and leave the theatre charged, with a sense of excitement.
No opposing quotes found.