It is a rule of international law that weapons and methods of warfare which do not discriminate between combatants and civilians should never be used.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It's never acceptable to target civilians. It violates the Geneva Accords, it violates the international law of war and it violates all principles of morality.
Indiscriminate attacks on civilians ought, under all circumstances, to be illegal in war as in peacetime.
A country should be defended not by arms, but by ethical behavior.
If you shell a military base and happen to kill civilians, you have not committed a war crime; if you deliberately target cities and towns, you have.
So long as peace is not attained by law (so argue the advocates of armaments) the military protection of a country must not be undermined, and until such is the case disarmament is impossible.
We all say no to war, we are all for justice and peace. But sometimes in order to maintain peace, armed action is necessary. But we hope it won't be the case.
I don't think you can perpetrate war crimes with defensive weapons, with air defense systems.
I think, for me, anybody who is a terrorist should not have access to firearms.
If civilians are going to be killed, I would rather have them be their civilians than our civilians.
War is just when it is necessary; arms are permissible when there is no hope except in arms.