The thing that makes countries want to pursue some kind of nuclear deterrent is precisely the fact that they feel threatened.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The crucial thing is to arouse the awareness that as a matter of human conscience we can never permit the people of any country to fall victim to nuclear weapons, and for each individual to express their refusal to continue living in the shadow of the threat they pose.
Nuclear countries are those countries that are big and powerful. It is difficult to criticize them and try to lead them onto a humanitarian path. But we can only do what we can and appeal to their sense of reason.
If a country is suspected of going nuclear, you need to understand why. Why does it feel insecure?
It's Russia some people would like to get rid of. They are still afraid of our nuclear deterrent. We have our own foreign policy whether they like it or not.
Our nuclear weapons are meant purely as a deterrent against nuclear adventure by an adversary.
There are some people that will be deterred by the fact that we have nuclear weapons... But those people are the folks we can deal with anyway.
The widespread diffusion of nuclear weapons would make many nations able, and in some cases also create the pressure, to aggravate an on-going crisis, or even touch off a war between two other powers for purposes of their own.
Look, Israel doesn't intend to introduce nuclear weapons, but if people are afraid that we have them, why not? It's a deterrent.
It is of the greatest importance that people and governments in many more countries than ours should realize that it is more dangerous to have access to nuclear arms than not to possess them.
So long as nuclear weapons continue to exist, so will the temptation to threaten others with overwhelming military force.
No opposing quotes found.