If someone's criticism is completely unfounded on data, then I don't want to hear it. It doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
People frequently ask me if adverse criticism bothers me. I've had a lot of it, and I have been able to shrug most of it off.
I do put my questions in terms of the sharpest polarities of the issue. But I don't want a preponderance of opinion over factual data.
If there is no criticism, you become lazy. But it should be constructive, and it should be the truth. If it's biased and there's no truth in it, then I don't care about it. If it's true, it helps me grow.
I don't take criticism lying down.
Perhaps it would be better for science, that all criticism should be avowed.
Have you ever noticed how most critics disagree with the public? That should tell you a lot about critics.
If I were less than honest as a critic, I think people would spot that right away, and it would destroy my credibility.
I can't control the criticism. It's something you certainly don't appreciate, but by the same token, everybody is entitled to their opinion.
I don't see the logic of rejecting data just because they seem incredible.
Their is no defense against criticism except obscurity.