It's not that the film is violent, it's that people have an issue with violence right now.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Violence has been a part of films since the beginning of time. It's been a form of entertainment.
I don't think movies are the reason why this violence exists, I think it's going to happen whether movies are there or not.
Violence is used to portray what happens in a film. It only helps portray the actors and what they do. I think it is more about the story, when you have something to play off of.
I don't feel comfortable with violence, and I'm not sure that I film violent scenes properly, and it's something I'm reticent to do, and yet violence is sort of in all of my films.
Personally, I can't stand violence. In any standard American mainstream movie, there's 20 times more violence than in any one of my films, so I don't know why those directors aren't asked why they're such specialists for violence.
I've written films that are violent. I'm not big on sitting and watching violence.
I think if there was no violence in our world, there would be no violence in film. Violence is a part of human nature, and obviously it's a troublesome part of human nature. You always have responsibilities when you portray violence in what angle you put down on that scene.
I think violence has always been popular, way before movies started being made.
I don't think violence on film breeds violence in life. Violence in life breeds violence in films.
Physical violence is always a bore in films today. We don't see how much it hurts. We don't learn the true consequences of it.