I guess in Australia every film is sort of an indie film because there are no studios.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
National film industries tend to move in cycles. In Australia right now, we're on a high, a feeling of potential, which as yet shows no sign of flagging. But the word 'industry' is misleading. A small national cinema has no industry in the Hollywood sense.
I love indie movies. I think that independent cinema is where it's at and where a lot of trends begin. It's where new filmmakers are breaking through.
I think indie films have more of a fresh, experimental vibe about them, whereas studio films know what they want and can basically get it.
We don't consider black, urban films as 'indies,' though many of them are shot for under $10 million which is kind of the definition of an indie.
You can make films in a lot of countries, but they don't have very wide releases.
I'm from Australia, where the film industry is potent but small.
Indie movies got co-opted by the studio system. The studios insisted that only stars could make movies successful.
Independent film is almost nonexistent right now, because all the distributers that used to love to put out these little art films are all out of business right now, because it costs so much to open a movie.
It's becoming increasingly harder and harder; there's no such thing as independent film anymore. There aren't any, they don't exist. In the old days you could go and get a certain amount of the budget with foreign sales, now everybody wants a marketable angle.
It's hard to pinpoint why all of a sudden a group of Australian films will be doing well and why they perhaps are better made than some from the past.
No opposing quotes found.