A tax cut to compensate for a tax increase is not a cut - it's a con.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Look, only in Washington is not raising taxes considered a tax cut. Nobody's getting a tax cut here. We're not cutting taxes. We're preventing tax increases from occurring.
It was an absurd theory that by cutting taxes you would increase government revenues, because the growth of the economy would create an overflow of taxes that would fall into the government coffers.
I'm for tax reform, not tax increases.
I think the tax cut is ridiculous but so am I.
Tax cuts are like sex: When they are good, they are very, very good. And when they are bad, they are still pretty good.
The polls are with us on this. They say the American people, more than anything, want to see spending cuts rather than tax increases.
Looking at the high cost of occupation in Iraq and the needs we have in this country, would it not have been better to have smaller tax cuts in order to keep down the deficits.
There are some Republicans who say that any time you raise new revenue, you have to have a tax cut to match it. I am not one of those Republicans.
It has always amazed me how tax cuts don't work until they take effect. Mr. Obama's experience with deferred tax rate increases will be the reverse. The economy will collapse in 2011.
Not continuing a tax cut is not technically a tax increase.