Most television could be presented by a dachshund. Radio can't, although there are a lot of dachshunds in there.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If you are interested in ideas, radio is way more pure than television. You're not distracted by somebody's nose or hair or posture. You can really see how someone thinks and penetrate to the essence of who that person is.
I would always prefer radio or working behind the scenes where I don't have to be seen. I don't like how appearance oriented TV is (especially now that I'm middle aged!). But I am developing a show revolving around animal rescue which will hopefully entertain and maybe do a bit of good for the cause as well.
Whenever there's a new form of media, we always think it's going to replace the old thing, and it never does. We still have radio, however long after TV was introduced.
My kids don't watch any TV, but they watch videos and films. I'm sure they watch it at friends' houses.
Television contracts the imagination and radio expands it.
I don't think that TV on the Radio is some dark mysterious band that no one can know about. We write music because it's an immediate form of communication. We're able to put on record what's happening in our times, and we want that message to be heard by the most amount of people.
While theoretically and technically television may be feasible, commercially and financially it is an impossibility.
There was no television, so the radio provided you with everything.
I had no trouble going from radio to TV - I just thought of TV as radio with pictures.
TV gives everyone an image, but radio gives birth to a million images in a million brains.