The reader really has to step up to the plate and read a short story.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think people seem to want to read pieces that are shorter but not as short as the pieces they can read in small bites on the Internet. It may be that the sort of long essays are hitting a sweet spot between the tiny morsels online and the full-length book.
Everything has to be pulling weight in a short story for it to be really of the first order.
Short stories are often strong meat. Reading them, even listening to them, can be challenging, by which I do not mean hard work, simply that a certain amount of nerve and maturity is required.
The truth is, you have about three paragraphs in a short story, three pages in a novel, to capture that editor's attention enough for her to finish your story.
With short stories, you can always see the whole, but it's just so hard to get everything you want into that small form.
The short story is a very natural mode of storytelling; most stories can be told quickly. I always think of them as like a tightrope walk - every sentence is a step along the rope, and you can so easily misplace your step and break your neck.
Limited points of view let the writer dispense - and the reader gather - information from various corners of the story. It all becomes a kind of dance, with the writer guiding the reader through the various twists and turns. The challenge is keeping readers in step, while still managing to surprise.
Each reader needs to bring his or her own mind and heart to the text.
I don't want my readers slowed down by long passages of narrative.
It's a responsibility of the writer to get the reader out of the story somehow.