False Claims Act violators who self-report generally receive the same penalties and face the same damages as those who are caught. I think this makes very little sense.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The law does not pretend to punish everything that is dishonest. That would seriously interfere with business.
Anyone can be falsely accused of a crime. Everyone accused of a crime deserves a fair trial.
A State can sue for negligence as well as fraud damages.
You wanna know people are held accountable if they engage in misconduct and that no one is above the law.
As a lawyer who has dealt in defamation, I know that someone's reputation has to be lowered in the eyes of right-thinking people to sue.
If you're hit with a lawsuit that's untrue and the reasons you're hit with it aren't clear to you, there's a very big inclination on people's part to want to take responsibility for it - that this must be happening because I'm a terrible person, I did something, and I'm getting repaid for it.
It's not fair that the accused is not protected from adverse publicity whilst the accuser is guaranteed anonymity, whatever the verdict.
Complainant received immediate lacerations of the credibility.
When someone makes a claim against the state, that person must legally verify that the facts in the claim are true.
I was falsely arrested twice, slandered and defamed.
No opposing quotes found.