Frankly, I'd rather make a little bit less money if it means living in a better world for books and publishing in the future.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'd rather make less money and live in a just world.
I don't publish the books to make money, not at all.
Is it better to go indie and make bigger profits on each book, or stick with a print publisher's 6%-10% royalties? Since I never could figure out what I wanted to do when I grew up, I'm hedging my bets and working both sides of the street.
Fame, money and the size of the market are not very important to me. What is, is writing a book that is worth doing and then publishing it. I don't write books for entertainment, for people to pass the time then throw away.
If you're going to write a book that might, in its very best accidental career, sell 30,000 copies, you've got to have a day job.
When I left college I thought - based on a staggeringly inadequate understanding of how the world worked - that I might like to go into book publishing.
The publishing industry has always wanted to make books as cheaply and as ephemerally as they could; it's nothing new.
I think people get satisfaction from living for a cause that's greater than themselves. They want to leave an imprint. By writing books, I'm trying to do that in a modest way.
Of course I want to be a best seller because I'm in the business and I want to be read, but there is no money in the world that can compensate for writing badly.
No matter how much money I made from writing, I'd keep the bookstore job.