Individuals want to know that none of their own money is being invested in companies that put their profits ahead of international security.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It's basic due diligence to make sure that whenever a foreign entity acquires a controlling interest in a U.S. company that national security isn't threatened.
They're out there, this appalling idea that there are companies that profit - not just profit but profit enormously - through war.
There's a tendency to look at investments in isolation. Investors focus on the risk of individual securities.
Most people are under exposed to global assets, including foreign stocks, bonds and currencies.
Unbeknownst to most American investors, significant portions of their public pension, mutual fund, life insurance and private portfolios are comprised of stocks of privately held companies that partner with state sponsors of terror.
In countries operating a largely capitalist system, there does not appear to be a wide understanding among its actors and overseers of either its advantages or its hazards.
But a lot of businesses out there don't see the return on investment, they look at it as a liability, and until they can understand that proactive security actually returns, gives them a return on investment, it's still a hard sell for people.
Most business people today are not going to invest in the uncertainty that exists in America.
The U.S. and Israel probably lead the way in terms of venture investment in technologies companies focused on the security paradigm. That is quite encouraging.
I always invest my own money in the companies that I create. I don't believe in the whole thing of just using other people's money. I don't think that's right. I'm not going to ask other people to invest in something if I'm not prepared to do so myself.
No opposing quotes found.