Research has shown that a barren environment is much more damaging to baby animals than it is to adult animals. It does not hurt the adult animals the same way it damages babies.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
One of the things I say is from an evolutionary point of view: probably the ideal rich environment for a baby includes more mud, livestock, and relatives than most of us could tolerate nowadays.
The earth is a great big orphanage for most animals.
All zoos are both beguiling and repellent.
Nature favors those organisms which leave the environment in better shape for their progeny to survive.
When it comes to wilderness animals we have to make an effort to preserve what areas we can that they can be themselves in. Its come to a point though, clearly, where some species have to be cared for by humans if they are not going to disappear altogether.
Any abuse of animals is the same as abuse of men, women, or children.
Nature makes only dumb animals. We owe the fools to society.
Whenever you have an animal and bring another one into the house, it's a very traumatic event. It's a story as old as bringing home a second child from the hospital, when the first child kind of goes, 'Hey, aren't I enough?'
Humans are the only animals that have children on purpose with the exception of guppies, who like to eat theirs.
I do love nature, but I don't suppose I'd spent more time in zoos as a child than anyone else!
No opposing quotes found.