A fox should not be on the jury at a goose's trial.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The problem that I think is reasonable to assert about Fox and its coverage is that they make up stories out of whole cloth and then make a big deal out of them.
Choosing how you vote should not be a snap verdict based on a few minutes of television.
I don't think anyone at Fox believes they are producing even-handed, impartial coverage.
With foxes we must play the fox.
I'm not anti-fox hunting because, to me, shooting foxes is even worse and the results are horrendous.
There may sometimes be a mistake, but I think that the citizens of America who are sworn to uphold their duty in a jury setting are going to try to do their best to do that regardless of the consequences.
The jury had down right contempt for punk rock grass roots ethics.
It is better that a guilty man should not be brought to trial than that he should be acquitted.
We started Fox when everyone said it couldn't be done.
Think of submitting our measure to the advice of politicians! I would as soon submit the subject of the equality of a goose to a fox.