My argument is that War makes rattling good history; but Peace is poor reading.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Indeed; peace literature is almost exclusively read, though to good effect, by pacifists, while what is needed is the canvassing of those who have not so far been won to the cause.
A bad peace is even worse than war.
Loud peace propaganda makes war seem imminent.
It is far easier to make war than peace.
If you use weapons of war to bring about peace, you're going to have more war and destruction.
I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace.
A sane person doesn't think war is a good idea.
Making peace is harder than making war.
Wars are, of course, as a rule to be avoided; but they are far better than certain kinds of peace.
Peace is not only better than war, but infinitely more arduous.