Without a moral framework, there is nothing left but immediate self-indulgence by some and the path of least resistance by others. Neither can sustain a free society.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
A free and rooted society ought to consist of a web of moral obligations. We have the right to ignore them, but we ought to be actually obliged not to let other people starve or to let them lapse into destitution.
Societies are not sustainable without institutions.
Freedom without virtue isn't freedom - it will eventually destroy a society.
You cannot have Liberty in this world without what you call Moral Virtue, and you cannot have Moral Virtue without the slavery of that half of the human race who hate what you call Moral Virtue.
If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.
The oppressed never free themselves - they do not have the necessary strengths.
Society exists for the benefit of its members, not the members for the benefit of society.
Personally, I think it is possible to build a society that is moral on a nonreligious basis, but the jury is still out on that.
What I do deny is that you can build any enduring society without some such mystical ethos.
Try to find the path of least resistance and use it without harming others. Live with integrity and morality, not only with people but with all beings.