Mere access to the courthouse doors does not by itself assure a proper functioning of the adversary process.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
And it is no less true, that personal security and private property rest entirely upon the wisdom, the stability, and the integrity of the courts of justice.
Doubt comes in at the window when inquiry is denied at the door.
Our first concern is the security of the lawyers because without security you can't possibly have a fair trial, if trial at all, and that's not been adequately attended to.
At the NYPD, a judge doesn't need to sign off on opening up an investigation into a mosque as a terrorism organization. The oversight is internal.
Obama's respect for the Constitution does not apply to protections against unreasonable search and seizure, as Obama's deeply intrusive National Security Agency programs prove.
A trial without witnesses, when it involves a criminal accusation, a criminal matter, is not a true trial.
I have not fully had the opportunity to evaluate the impact of cameras in the courtroom.
The Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process.
A lapse in judgment is not a crime.
When a contradiction is impossible to resolve except by a lie, then we know that it is really a door.
No opposing quotes found.