I'm a working journalist. I'm interested in all points of view, and I draw conclusions based on facts, not just on opinions.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I tell my students, even if you are an opinion journalist, your opinion should be based on facts.
You will always have partial points of view, and you'll always have the story behind the story that hasn't come out yet. And any form of journalism you're involved with is going to be up against a biased viewpoint and partial knowledge.
If journalism is good, it is controversial, by its nature.
I'm fascinated by journalism. I put a keen eye, not a negative eye, on its role, particularly how it is changed by the times we're living in.
Journalism, as concerns collecting information, differs little if at all from intelligence work. In my judgment, a journalist's job is very interesting.
Speaking generally, people who are drawn to journalism are interested in what happens from the ground up less than they are from the top down.
I have been fortunate that publications like the 'New York Times' and 'The Wall Street Journal' have allowed me to share some of my opinions with a wider audience.
Journalism is about results. It's about affecting your community or your society in the most progressive way.
When I started working for Rolling Stone, I became very interested in journalism and thought maybe that's what I was doing, but it wasn't true. What became important was to have a point of view.
But I'm very careful with opinions because I never know what the truth is. When I read what the press says about me, I don't really believe what it says about other people.
No opposing quotes found.