And we've got to ask ourselves some very serious questions as to whether or not certain religious leaders, in terms of raising money - I hate to bring this up - are pushing hot buttons.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I don't think anyone enjoys raising money, but for some reason I seem to have a knack.
From the beginning, there have been some religious leaders who greeted the funding of faith-based social services by government with ambivalence.
I'm not a religious person, but I prefer God to money.
I think the discussion of, you know, can we put a cap on wealth creation and distribution - it's something that should be at the heart of every Christian that is a capitalist. Is, what is the purpose I'm doing with this wealth?
The honest man might observe... that no one gets something for nothing; that politicians go in poor and go out rich; that the Government screws up everything it touches; and that the Will to Believe is best confined to the Religious Venue, as to practice it elsewhere is just too damned expensive.
I'm a believer in the Constitution and in the First Amendment. Not just for raising money but also for freedom of speech.
We need leadership that can elevate religion and morality to their position of paramount importance and thus eliminate growing selfishness, immorality and materialism.
Under this president, we have a government that has grown too big, too costly and now even more overbearing by forcing religious entities to abandon their beliefs.
Among politicians the esteem of religion is profitable; the principles of it are troublesome.
When it is a question of money, everybody is of the same religion.