If computers remain far worse than us at image recognition, a certain over-confident combination of man and machine can elsewhere take inaccuracy to a whole new level.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
One thing that humans still do better than computers is recognize images.
Computers seem a little too adaptively flexible, like the strange natives, odd societies, and head cases we study in the social sciences. There's more opposable thumb in the digital world than I care for; it's awfully close to human.
People assume that computers will do everything that humans do. Not good. People are different from each other and they are all really different from computers.
Men and machines are good at different things. People form plans and make decisions in complicated situations. We are less good at making sense of enormous amounts of data. Computers are exactly the opposite: they excel at efficient data processing but struggle to make basic judgments that would be simple for any human.
Our lives sometimes depend on computers performing as predicted.
We have to make machines understand what they're doing, or they won't be able to come back and say, 'Why did you do that?'
Computers are magnificent tools for the realization of our dreams, but no machine can replace the human spark of spirit, compassion, love, and understanding.
Computer vision and machine learning have really started to take off, but for most people, the whole idea of what is a computer seeing when it's looking at an image is relatively obscure.
Today, computers are almost second nature to most of us.
We're making progress, but getting machines to replicate our ability to perceive and manipulate the world remains incredibly hard.
No opposing quotes found.