A theoretical grounding in agronomy must, therefore, include knowledge of biological laws.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
And the more profoundly the science of biology reveals the laws of the life and development of living bodies, the more effective is the science of agronomy.
In essence, the science of agronomy is inseparable from biology.
The laws of nature are structured so that we grow and change, and get to experience the full spectrum of biological existence.
Science is knowledge arranged and classified according to truth, facts, and the general laws of nature.
Most scientists like to operate in the context of economy. If you don't need an explanatory principle, don't invoke it.
From all this it follows what the general character of the problem of the development of a body of scientific knowledge is, in so far as it depends on elements internal to science itself.
My feeling is that scientific method has the power to account for and interlink all phenomena in the universe, including its origin, using the laws of nature. But that still leaves the laws unexplained.
Close contact between science and the practice of collective farms and State farms creates inexhaustible opportunities for the development of theoretical knowledge, enabling us to learn ever more and more about the nature of living bodies and the soil.
The first law of ecology is that everything is related to everything else.
Every fundamental law has exceptions. But you still need the law or else all you have is observations that don't make sense. And that's not science. That's just taking notes.
No opposing quotes found.