There are not as many women who support the national defense budget now as men. I really think there is a gender gap in the support for the large expenditures that are necessary to modernize the force.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Women are needed in the military because there aren't enough soldiers, and we're seeing more women serve.
Might it not be that a great force that has always been thinking in terms of human needs, and that always will think in terms of human needs, has not been mobilized? Is it not possible that the women of the country have something of value to give the nation at this time?
If we want the most effective fighting force, we need to pick the most qualified capable man for the job, even if it's a woman.
Combat duty is strenuous and physically demanding, and I'm not the first person to notice that men and women are built differently. And while many will argue that women will only be allowed into combat arms units under the same requirements as their male counterparts, count me as skeptical.
This is still a man's profession, with a lot of men who intellectually and emotionally have not accepted that the military could be women's work.
I really think we need more women to lean into their careers and to be really dedicated to staying in the work force.
It's mainly a few elite women who benefit greatly from standing with the forces that keep women down.
I think women are too valuable to be in combat.
And while national military forces have historically resisted the full participation of women soldiers, female talent has found plenty of scope in revolutionary and terrorist groups around the planet.
Putting women in military combat is the cutting edge of the feminist goal to force us into an androgynous society.
No opposing quotes found.