Those expressions are omitted which can not with propriety be read aloud in the family.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It is, of course, traditional in children's literature to get rid of the parents.
The long history of conversations that family members share contributes not only to how listeners interpret words but also to how speakers choose them.
When you're around your family, and you have that history and that shared language, you say things you'd be embarrassed to hear quoted back to you later.
Family means no one gets left behind or forgotten.
Liberals subscribe to the new flexible, pluralistic definition of the family; their defense of families carries no conviction.
Everything you say in a family carries meaning from all that was said before. So with friends, there is less likelihood of a few words triggering associations from childhood, where our deepest emotions often are rooted.
As regards parents, I should like to see them as highly educated as possible, and I do not restrict this remark to fathers alone.
It's a very telling thing when you have children. You have to be there for them, you've got to set an example, when you're not sure what your example is, and anyway the world is changing so fast you don't know what is appropriate anymore.
When there's trouble in a family, it tends to show up in the weakest member. And all the other members of the family know that. They make allowances for the one in trouble.
We write not only for children but also for their parents. They, too, are serious children.
No opposing quotes found.