But the point is to get a whole new generation of people and people in general more re-engaged in news, and this has happened a lot since September 11th of course.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
People can get their news any way they want. What I love about what's happened is that there are so many different avenues, there are so many different outlets, so many different ways to debate and discuss and to inquire about any given news story.
My general view is the delivery of news is changing in dramatic ways, and will continue to change into ways we can't even predict.
The great concern is that year after year, rising numbers of journalists are being killed in pursuit of their work. They are increasingly seen as not being neutral but rather as combatants by one side or the other.
I still believe that if your aim is to change the world, journalism is a more immediate short-term weapon.
I don't know how much you follow current events. For some, there's not enough time to keep up on what's happening; for others, the news is too depressing, and peering too deeply fills one with boiling frustration all too quickly.
I like to cover news when it happens, not five years later.
The mission of the press is to spread culture while destroying the attention span.
The democratic approach to news is a very valuable thing. We're always going to be dependent on the quality of reporting of mainstream media.
News reports don't change the world. Only facts change it, and those have already happened when we get the news.
I think that more diversity is a good thing, and fresh points of view articulated by people who are committed to excellence in journalism is a beneficial change in the American media landscape.
No opposing quotes found.