Liberals, it has been said, are generous with other peoples' money, except when it comes to questions of national survival when they prefer to be generous with other people's freedom and security.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Funny thing is that the poorer people are, the more generous they seem to be.
A liberal is a man who is willing to spend somebody else's money.
A rich man told me recently that a liberal is a man who tells other people what to do with their money.
Liberals seem to assume that, if you don't believe in their particular political solutions, then you don't really care about the people that they claim to want to help.
Forcing people to be generous isn't humanitarian, effective, compassionate or moral. Only acts that are truly voluntary for all concerned can be truly compassionate.
A liberal is a man who will give away everything he doesn't own.
Liberals are concerned about the concentration of wealth because it almost inevitably leads to a concentration of power that undermines democracy.
Liberty isn't liberalism, arbitrariness, but it's connected; it's conditioned by the great values of love and solidarity and in general by the good.
If liberals want to send tens of millions of dollars down the drain, I have no problem with that.
It's very, very hard to be generous and compassionate if you haven't got a dollar in you back pocket to pay for it, to actually pay for those services that people need.
No opposing quotes found.