People who have expertise or the luck to have rehearsal time with cameras have it over people who don't.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I've worked with actors who treat the first two takes like rehearsals. And that's okay. If the camera is on you and we're doing a scene where I'm off camera, I'm treating that as a rehearsal.
I think rehearsal can be important if it's done in a way that works. Often, rehearsal can be a waste of time.
I've walked with very famous people down red carpets over to the crowd of thousands of people, and you'll reach out to shake their hand and they've got a camera in their hand. And they don't even get their hand out, because they're recording the whole time.
It's very rare to have rehearsal time on a television show: You get scripts, you show up, and you do it.
There is the danger of over preparation, of loss of spontaneity; over rehearsal is the most terrible thing you can imagine. We do have a very close association between costume and set designer, though. And the cameraman is very important, of course.
The rehearsal is where it all happens for an actor.
I think, for different types of things, more rehearsal is very important.
If you're filming somebody doing something they really want to do, you're probably not very high on their list of problems to deal with. You see James Carville on the phone - he's like that whether you have a camera or not. He isn't doing it just for you, and that's hard to explain.
Put me on telly, and I think I have a relaxation on camera that makes an audience relax, too. It's not a conscious thing. Cameras don't bother me, whereas other people try to perform to them.
The process of rehearsal means you learn so much and really get the chance to develop your work on a character.
No opposing quotes found.