It is much simpler to buy books than to read them and easier to read them than to absorb their contents.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Buying books would be a good thing if one could also buy the time to read them in: but as a rule the purchase of books is mistaken for the appropriation of their contents.
Reading is as much a part of life as any part, and it's life itself. And it allows us to live other lives that we might not have lived if we hadn't picked up those books.
Books are good enough in their own way, but they are a poor substitute for life.
Books have the power to be the light we are seeking at crucial moments in our lives. Reading helps us realize we are not alone, that we can change our circumstances and even achieve the impossible.
Few are sufficiently sensible of the importance of that economy in reading which selects, almost exclusively, the very first order of books. Why, except for some special reason, read an inferior book, at the very time you might be reading one of the highest order?
There's so much more to a book than just the reading.
I know in this time of great technological advancement, the idea of reading a book seems almost anachronistic, but I think it's worth preserving.
Reading is a free practice. I think the readers are free to begin by the books where they want to. They don't have to be led in their reading.
If one cannot enjoy reading a book over and over again, there is no use in reading it at all.
I tend to think of the reading of any book as preparation for the next reading of it. There are always intervening books or facts or realizations that put a book in another light and make it different and richer the second or the third time.
No opposing quotes found.