If a reporter doesn't like the person he's writing about, it shows up in his article.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think, though, that people will read into a reporter's story a bias that they want to see in a reporter.
A journalist is a person who has mistaken their calling.
The reporter claimed he was going to write the article from my point of view. Instead, he made me sound like a little idiot. It made me never want to do another interview again.
It's not the journalists; it's the critics that I can't understand. I've never understood what kind of a person would want to criticize someone else's work.
That's always been my test for what makes a story: is this something journalists would gossip with each other about?
When a reporter sits down at the typewriter, he's nobody's friend.
The fact that a man is a newspaper reporter is evidence of some flaw of character.
There's a longstanding tradition that journalists don't cheer in the press box. They have opinions, like anyone else, but they are expected to keep those opinions out of their work.
I think that if journalists, reporters who spend a lot of time on a story, are honest with themselves, we all have feelings about our subjects - I mean, unless you're a robot.
Journalists write because they have nothing to say, and have something to say because they write.