I try to consider each body of work on its own terms, discretely, so terms like 'sculpture' or 'photography', in their broad sense, don't really enter into my thinking.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The arts equally have distinct departments, and unless photography has its own possibilities of expression, separate from those of the other arts, it is merely a process, not an art.
Photography has always been about documentary, the depiction of the instant, a moment, sometimes a place. Each project is somehow an experimentation of a specific context or a character.
Photography is about finding things. And painting is different - it's about making something.
It's extremely difficult to say what one actually means by 'sculpture' other than, in a provisional sense, it's something that goes on the floor or a pedestal, and loosely applies to a certain history of the use of that term.
I think I understand something about space. I think the job of a sculptor is spatial as much as it is to do with form.
Sculpture is something you bump into when you back up to look at a painting.
If Art relates itself to an Object, it becomes descriptive, divisionist, literary.
I refer to what I do as 'conceptual portraits,' meaning that I come up with an idea or concept that I would like to explore, and then I find people that fit that idea.
I did photography, painting, and drawing, but I prefer sculpture. I like it because it's very physical.
I understood the craft of photography when done by an artist is art.