Strict conservation of energy in the elementary process had thus been confirmed also by a negative experiment.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Probably the simplest hypothesis... is that there may be a slow process of annihilation of matter.
After developing a primitive theory (1968) I therefore did not pursue this subject. However, the work was taken up by others and in 1974 the first experiments were done in the ISR.
If you're a physicist, for heaven's sake, and here is the experiment, and you have a theory, and the theory doesn't agree with the experiment, then you have to cut out the theory. You were wrong with the theory.
If you assume that it was a valid experiment, then its disintegration reveals a very substantial part of what has been found since then, including the fact that you can get heat generation at high temperature.
When an idea reaches critical mass there is no stopping the shift its presence will induce.
For each of us who appear to have had a successful experiment there are many to whom their own experiments seem barren and negative.
One of the bedrock principles of physics is the conservation of energy. In this universe, energy can be neither created nor destroyed.
I should point out, however, that at first some difficulty was experienced in observing the phenomena predicted by the theory, owing to the extreme smallness of the variations in the period of oscillation.
I must confess that, at that time, I had absolutely no knowledge of the slowness of the relaxation processes in the ground state, processes which take place in collisions with the wall or with the molecules of a foreign gas.
At first, I am giving energy to the creation, but later the creation seems to be giving energy to me.
No opposing quotes found.