A far greater factor than abolishing poverty is the deterrent effect of swift and certain consequences: swift arrest, prompt trial, certain penalty and - at some point - finality of judgment.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Consequences are unpitying.
Poverty is restriction and as such, it is the greatest injustice you can perpetrate upon yourself.
Nothing will deter crime but the certainty of punishment.
Poverty must be reduced not only for reasons of moral and justice, but also of security.
Swift justice demands more than just swiftness.
I think it's common sense to say that the longer away from a crime it gets prosecuted, the less deterrent effect there is.
Actions have consequences.
Forced labor affects the most vulnerable and least protected people, perpetuating a vicious cycle of poverty and dependency. Women, low-skilled migrant workers, children, indigenous peoples, and other groups suffering discrimination on different grounds are disproportionately affected.
You can distill deterrence down to two factors: capability and will.
Alleviating poverty would be the Bank's overarching objective.
No opposing quotes found.