I am suggesting that we recognize that in network and interface research there is something as profound (and potential wild) as Artificial Intelligence.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I definitely fall into the camp of thinking of AI as augmenting human capability and capacity.
We must develop as quickly as possible technologies that make possible a direct connection between brain and computer, so that artificial brains contribute to human intelligence rather than opposing it.
Artificial intelligence, in fact, is obviously an intelligence transmitted by conscious subjects, an intelligence placed in equipment. It has a clear origin, in fact, in the intelligence of the human creators of such equipment.
We could construct a machine that is more intelligent than we can understand. It's possible Google is that kind of thing already. It scales so fast.
By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it.
Nobody phrases it this way, but I think that artificial intelligence is almost a humanities discipline. It's really an attempt to understand human intelligence and human cognition.
There is huge demand for artificial intelligence technologies.
In fact, there was general agreement that minds can exist on nonbiological substrates and that algorithms are of central importance to the existence of minds.
I think what's really amazing is that given the scale of the web and getting the compute power we have today, we're starting to see things that appear intelligent but actually aren't semantically intelligent.
Is artificial intelligence less than our intelligence?